Use case

Organizational network analysis

Organizational network analysis (ONA) maps how work actually flows between people, as opposed to the reporting lines on an org chart. It shows the informal experts everyone goes to, the bottlenecks everything waits on, and the teams that never talk to each other.

Updated · Netgraf

What ONA finds

PatternWhat it looks likeMeasure
Hidden expertMany people go to them for adviceDegree on advice ties
BottleneckOne person links two teamsBetweenness, cut points
SiloTeams with dense ties inside and few acrossCommunities
Overloaded hubThe network runs through one managerCentralization
Peripheral newcomerFew ties, all within one teamDegree, closeness

How to run a small ONA

  1. Pick one question per network: "Whom do you go to for advice on X?" or "Whom do you work with weekly?"
  2. Survey everyone in scope, allowing up to five names each.
  3. Build an edge list (person, named person) and import it.
  4. Add each person's team as the subtitle so the groups are readable.
  5. Colour the map by group in Insights and compare the groups found with the teams on the org chart. Where they differ is the finding.

Krackhardt's classic study of a small firm found that the person with the most advice ties was not the person with the most power; the kite is a textbook reduction of exactly that problem.

Example maps

Open one to explore it, then press Edit a copy to make it yours.

Questions

Is ONA ethical?
It can be, with consent and care. Tell people what is collected and why, report patterns rather than rank individuals, and never use a network map for performance reviews. Keep the map unlisted and share it only with the people who need it.

Draw your own

Free, no account, and private by default. Start blank, import a spreadsheet, or describe the network in words.